Possible Digoxin-Related Toxic Effects in a Patient.

This case report describes a patient in their 70s with hypertension and heart failure presenting to the emergency department with chest discomfort, nausea, anorexia, and weakness.

Evaluation of therapeutic and toxic levels of serum digoxin concentration: a cross-sectional study from a tertiary hospital.

OBJECTIVE: Digoxin is a cardiac glycoside for treating heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Despite its limited therapeutic range and complex pharmacokinetic properties, this medication continues to be frequently prescribed. This study aimed to evaluate the serum digoxin concentration (SDC) at therapeutic, subtherapeutic, and toxic levels and explore the factors affecting these levels in patients receiving digoxin therapy for heart failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this descriptive and cross-sectional study, the data were obtained from the electronic system of patients who presented to Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University. For the SDC, the reference range was accepted as 0.5-0.9 ng/mL, and the upper limit was 2.0 ng/mL. The patient's demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and laboratory findings were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis were used. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The data of 419 patients (mean age: 65.9±16.1 years, 68.5% women) were evaluated. The mean SDC was 1.11±1.01 ng/mL, and it was below 0.5 ng/mL in 24.3% of the patients, 0.5-0.9 ng/mL in 23.4%, 0.9-2 ng/mL in 41.3%, and over 2 ng/mL in 11.1%. Age, male gender, the presence of diabetes mellitus, and high HbA1c values were found to be associated with greater SDC levels, but this was not statistically significant. The presence of renal failure, elevated creatinine and magnesium levels, and potassium, sodium, and calcium levels outside the normal limits significantly increased the SDC. High creatinine and low/high potassium values significantly affected the detection of SDC at the toxic level. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of SDC levels holds significance not only in the monitoring of toxicity but also in ensuring adherence to the recommended therapeutic range during therapy. It is recommended to exercise caution in terms of risk factors such as age, kidney function test results, and blood electrolyte levels.

Determining the Risk of Elevated Digoxin Concentrations Following Loading Dose in Patients With Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: The optimal loading dose of digoxin in patients with reduced kidney function is unknown. Tertiary references recommend reduced loading doses; however, these recommendations are based on immunoassays that are falsely elevated by the presence of digoxin-like immunoreactive substances, a problem that is minimized in modern assays. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether chronic kidney disease (CKD) or acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with supratherapeutic digoxin concentrations after a digoxin loading dose. METHODS: A retrospective analysis on patients who received an intravenous loading dose of digoxin with a digoxin concentration collected 6 to 24 hours after the end of the dose. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: AKI, CKD, and non-AKI/CKD (NKI) based on glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine. The primary outcome was frequency of supratherapeutic digoxin concentrations (>2 ng/mL) and secondary outcomes included frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 146 digoxin concentrations were included (AKI = 59, CKD = 16, NKI = 71). Frequencies of supratherapeutic concentrations were similar between groups (AKI: 10.2%, CKD: 18.8%, NKI: 11.3%; P = 0.61). Pre-planned logistic regression demonstrated no significant relationship between kidney function group and the development of a supratherapeutic concentration (AKI: odds ratio [OR]: 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4-4.5; CKD: OR 4.3, 95% CI: 0.7-23). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This is the first study in routine clinical practice evaluating the relationship between kidney function and digoxin peak concentrations that differentiates AKI from CKD. We did not find a relationship between kidney function and peak concentrations; however, the group with CKD was underpowered.

Association of serum digoxin concentration with morbidity and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation, heart failure and reduced ejection fraction of 45 % or below.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are common cardiovascular conditions linked to significant health burdens. This review aims to study the relationship of serum digoxin concentration and mortality and morbidity outcomes in defined population. METHODS: We conducted a thorough search of databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, from inception until 20th Aug 2023. Studies that explored the relationship between serum digoxin concentration and mortality, morbidity, or other clinical endpoints in AF and HFrEF patients (ejection fraction ≤45 %) were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: The selected studies exhibited a wide range of designs, patient cohorts, and measured outcomes. The association between serum digoxin concentration, mortality and morbidity endpoints like hospitalization rates and cardiovascular events were assessed in these studies. Despite the methodological diversity, our systematic review uncovered consistent trends across the studies, suggesting that elevated serum digoxin concentrations may correlate with higher mortality and morbidity in AF and HFrEF patients. CONCLUSION: This systematic review emphasizes the need for cautious management of serum digoxin levels in patients with concurrent AF and HFrEF. While digoxin remains a valuable treatment for heart failure, its potential adverse effects on outcomes in this specific patient subgroup call for vigilant monitoring and individualized treatment approaches. Further research is required to elucidate the dose-response relationship and potential confounding factors influencing outcomes associated with serum digoxin concentration in AF and HFrEF patients. Clinicians should consider these findings when making therapeutic decisions to enhance patient care and outcomes.

Uso de digoxina endovenosa en urgencias para tratar pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda y su impacto en la evolución a corto plazo / Use of digoxin in the emergency department to treat patients with acute heart failure and its impact on short-term outcomes

Objetivos: Analizar los factores relacionados con el uso de digoxina en urgencias en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) y el impacto pronóstico a corto plazo. Método: Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en 45 servicios de urgencias españoles sin tratamiento crónico con digoxina, los cuales se dividieron según recibiesen digoxina endovenosa en urgencias o no. Se recogieron 51 variables relativas al paciente o al episodio de descompensación y se investigó el perfil del paciente tratado con digoxina en urgencias. Como variables evolutivas se investigaron la necesidad de ingreso, la estancia en urgencias prolongada (> 24 horas) en dados de alta y la hospitalización prolongada (> 7 días) en ingresados, y la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 30 días por cualquier causa. Se analizó si el tratamiento con digoxina se asoció a diferencias evolutivas, de forma cruda y ajustada a las características del paciente y el episodio de ICA. Resultados: Se analizaron 15.549 pacientes (mediana = 83 años, mujeres = 55%), de los que 1.430 (9,2%) fueron tratados con digoxina. La digoxina se utilizó más en mujeres, pacientes jóvenes, en mejor clase funcional de la New York Heart Association (NYHA), pero con descompensaciones más graves y, sobre todo, cuando existía una fibrilación auricular (FA) con respuesta ventricular rápida como desencadenante. Se hospitalizó el 75,4% de pacientes (más frecuente en tratados con digoxina; 81,6% vs 74,8%, p < 0,001), tuvo estancia prolongada en urgencias el 38,3% (52,9% vs 37,2%, p < 0,001), hospitalización prolongada el 48,1% (49,3% vs 47,9%, p = 0,385), mortalidad intrahospitalaria el 7,2% (6,9% vs 7,2%, p = 0,712) y a 30 días el 9,7% (9,3% vs 9,7%, p = 0,625). El modelo ajustado mostró que el uso de digoxina en urgencias sólo se asoció con estancia prolongada en urgencias (OR = 1,883, IC 95% = 1,359-2,608), pero no con la necesidad de ingreso, hospitalización prolongada o mortalidad. (AU)

Objectives: To analyze factors related to the use of digoxin to treat patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in emergency departments (EDs) and the impact of digoxin treatment on short-term outcomes. Methods: We included patients diagnosed with AHF in 45 Spanish EDs. The patients, who were not undergoing long-term treatment for heart failure, were classified according to whether or not they were given intravenous digoxin in the ED. Fifty-one patient or cardiac decompensation episode variables were recorded to profile ED patients treated with digoxin. Outcome variables studied were the need for hospital admission, prolonged stay in the ED (> 24 hours) for discharged patients, prolonged hospitalization (> 7 days) for admitted patients, and all-cause in-hospital or 30-day mortality. The associations between digoxin treatment and the outcomes were studied with odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for patient and AHF episode characteristics. Results: Data for 15 549 patients (median age, 83 years; 55% women) were analyzed; 1430 (9.2%) were treated with digoxin. Digoxin was used more often in women, young patients, and those with better New York Heart Association (NYHA) classifications but more severe cardiac decompensation, especially if the trigger was atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Admissions were ordered for 75.4% of the patients overall (81.6% of digoxin-treated patients vs 74.8% of nontreated patients; P < .001). The ED stay was prolonged in 38.3% of patients discharged from the ED (52.9% of digoxin-treated patients vs 37.2% of nontreated patients; P < .001). The duration of hospital stay was prolonged in 48.1% (digoxin-treated, 49.3% vs 47.9%; P = .385). In-hospital mortality was 7.2% overall (6.9% vs 7.2%, P= .712), and 30-day mortality was 9.7% (9.3% vs 9.7%, P = .625). ED use of digoxin was associated with a prolonged stay in the department (adjusted OR, 1.883; 95% CI, 1.359-2.608) but not with hospitalization or mortality. (AU)

Use of digoxin in the emergency department to treat patients with acute heart failure and its impact on short-term outcomes. / Uso de digoxina endovenosa en urgencias para tratar pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda y su impacto en la evolución a corto plazo.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze factors related to the use of digoxin to treat patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in emergency departments (EDs) and the impact of digoxin treatment on short-term outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with AHF in 45 Spanish EDs. The patients, who were not undergoing long-term treatment for heart failure, were classified according to whether or not they were given intravenous digoxin in the ED. Fifty-one patient or cardiac decompensation episode variables were recorded to profile ED patients treated with digoxin. Outcome variables studied were the need for hospital admission, prolonged stay in the ED (> 24 hours) for discharged patients, prolonged hospitalization (> 7 days) for admitted patients, and all-cause in-hospital or 30-day mortality. The associations between digoxin treatment and the outcomes were studied with odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for patient and AHF episode characteristics. RESULTS: Data for 15 549 patients (median age, 83 years; 55% women) were analyzed; 1430 (9.2%) were treated with digoxin. Digoxin was used more often in women, young patients, and those with better New York Heart Association (NYHA) classifications but more severe cardiac decompensation, especially if the trigger was atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Admissions were ordered for 75.4% of the patients overall (81.6% of digoxin-treated patients vs 74.8% of nontreated patients; P .001). The ED stay was prolonged in 38.3% of patients discharged from the ED (52.9% of digoxin-treated patients vs 37.2% of nontreated patients; P .001). The duration of hospital stay was prolonged in 48.1% (digoxin-treated, 49.3% vs 47.9%; P = .385). In-hospital mortality was 7.2% overall (6.9% vs 7.2%, P= .712), and 30-day mortality was 9.7% (9.3% vs 9.7%, P = .625). ED use of digoxin was associated with a prolonged stay in the department (adjusted OR, 1.883; 95% CI, 1.359-2.608) but not with hospitalization or mortality. CONCLUSION: Digoxin continues to be used in one out of ten ED patients who are not already on long-term treatment with the drug. Digoxin use is associated with cardiac decompensation triggered by atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, younger age, women, and patients with better initial NYHA function status but possibly more severe decompensation. Digoxin use leads to a longer ED stay but is safe, as it is not associated with need for admission, prolonged hospitalization, or short-term mortality.

OBJETIVO: Analizar los factores relacionados con el uso de digoxina en urgencias en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) y el impacto pronóstico a corto plazo. METODO: Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados de ICA en 45 servicios de urgencias españoles sin tratamiento crónico con digoxina, los cuales se dividieron según recibiesen digoxina endovenosa en urgencias o no. Se recogieron 51 variables relativas al paciente o al episodio de descompensación y se investigó el perfil del paciente tratado con digoxina en urgencias. Como variables evolutivas se investigaron la necesidad de ingreso, la estancia en urgencias prolongada (> 24 horas) en dados de alta y la hospitalización prolongada (> 7 días) en ingresados, y la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y a 30 días por cualquier causa. Se analizó si el tratamiento con digoxina se asoció a diferencias evolutivas, de forma cruda y ajustada a las características del paciente y el episodio de ICA. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 15.549 pacientes (mediana = 83 años, mujeres = 55%), de los que 1.430 (9,2%) fueron tratados con digoxina. La digoxina se utilizó más en mujeres, pacientes jóvenes, en mejor clase funcional de la New York Heart Association (NYHA), pero con descompensaciones más graves y, sobre todo, cuando existía una fibrilación auricular (FA) con respuesta ventricular rápida como desencadenante. Se hospitalizó el 75,4% de pacientes (más frecuente en tratados con digoxina; 81,6% vs 74,8%, p 0,001), tuvo estancia prolongada en urgencias el 38,3% (52,9% vs 37,2%, p 0,001), hospitalización prolongada el 48,1% (49,3% vs 47,9%, p = 0,385), mortalidad intrahospitalaria el 7,2% (6,9% vs 7,2%, p = 0,712) y a 30 días el 9,7% (9,3% vs 9,7%, p = 0,625). El modelo ajustado mostró que el uso de digoxina en urgencias sólo se asoció con estancia prolongada en urgencias (OR = 1,883, IC 95% = 1,359-2,608), pero no con la necesidad de ingreso, hospitalización prolongada o mortalidad. CONCLUSIONES: La digoxina continúa utilizándose en uno de cada 10 pacientes con ICA atendidos en urgencias que no utilizaban este fármaco de manera habitual. Su uso se relaciona con un paciente cuya ICA ha sido descompensada por una FA con respuesta ventricular rápida, más joven y más frecuentemente mujer, en mejor clase funcional de la NYHA basal y con una descompensación posiblemente más grave. El uso de digoxina conlleva una estancia en urgencias más prolongada, pero su uso es seguro, pues no se asocia a la necesidad de ingreso, hospitalización prolongada o mortalidad a corto plazo.

Fundus autofluorescence, optical coherence tomography and electroretinography abnormalities in a patient with digoxin retinopathy that resemble those in KCNV2-associated retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Digoxin related retinal toxicity causes blurred vision, photophobia, central scotoma, color vision abnormality, and electroretinography (ERG) abnormalities. Here, we report a case with transient abnormalities in vison, in which fundus autofluorescence (FAF), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and ERG findings resembled those in KCNV2 (potassium voltage-gated channel modifier subfamily V member 2)-associated retinopathy. CASE REPORT: An 89-year-old woman presented with complaints of acute blurred vision, nyctalopia, photophobia, and color vision abnormality. She received digoxin for tachycardia induced by atrial fibrillation for a month. The fundi showed a faint white ring at the fovea, which showed hyperfluorescence in FAF. OCT showed a thickened EZ in the macula. A dark-adapted (DA)-30 ERG showed a reduced and "squaring (trough-flattened)" a-wave, and a delayed, supernormal b-wave, resulting in a high b/a-wave amplitude ratio. The digoxin dose was reduced following an elevation in serum levels. Five weeks later, her visual acuities improved, and abnormal hyperfluorescence on FAF disappeared. After 6 months, no visual symptoms were reported. The ellipsoid-zone thickening in OCT improved; however, the b/a-wave amplitude ratio on DA-30 ERG remained high. The b-wave in LA-long-flash ERG was initially reduced, which improved after correction of serum level of digoxin. CONCLUSIONS: The patient's clinical findings resembled those of patients with KCNV2-associated retinopathy or temporal hyperkalemia. These disorders appear to have a common pathogenesis, which may be related to abnormal extracellular potassium levels in the retina. The on-bipolar cells seemed to be more affected than the off-bipolar cells in digoxin related retinal toxicity.

Medication-Related Adverse Events and Discordancies in Cystatin C-Based vs Serum Creatinine-Based Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Cancer.

Importance: Serum creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcr) may overestimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with cancer. Cystatin C-based eGFR (eGFRcys) is an alternative marker of GFR. Objective: To determine whether the therapeutic drug levels and adverse events (AEs) associated with renally cleared medications were higher in patients with cancer whose eGFRcys was more than 30% lower than their eGFRcr. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed adult patients with cancer at 2 major academic cancer centers in Boston, Massachusetts. These patients had their creatinine and cystatin C measured on the same day between May 2010 and January 2022. The date of the first simultaneous eGFRcr and eGFRcys measurement was considered to be the baseline date. Exposure: The primary exposure was eGFR discordance, defined as an eGFRcys that was more than 30% lower than the eGFRcr. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was risk of the following medication-related AEs within 90 days of the baseline date: (1) supratherapeutic vancomycin trough level greater than 30 µg/mL, (2) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-related hyperkalemia (>5.5 mEq/L), (3) baclofen toxic effect, and (4) supratherapeutic digoxin level (>2.0 ng/mL). For the secondary outcome, a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to compare 30-day survival of those with vs without eGFR discordance. Results: A total of 1869 adult patients with cancer (mean [SD] age, 66 [14] years; 948 males [51%]) had simultaneous eGFRcys and eGFRcr measurement. There were 543 patients (29%) with an eGFRcys that was more than 30% lower than their eGFRcr. Patients with an eGFRcys that was more than 30% lower than their eGFRcr were more likely to experience medication-related AEs compared with patients with concordant eGFRs (defined as eGFRcys within 30% of eGFRcr), including vancomycin levels greater than 30 µg/mL (43 of 179 [24%] vs 7 of 77 [9%]; P = .01), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-related hyperkalemia (29 of 129 [22%] vs 11 of 92 [12%]; P = .07), baclofen toxic effects (5 of 19 [26%] vs 0 of 11; P = .19), and supratherapeutic digoxin levels (7 of 24 [29%] vs 0 of 10; P = .08). The adjusted odds ratio for vancomycin levels more than 30 µg/mL was 2.59 (95% CI, 1.08-7.03; P = .04). Patients with an eGFRcys more than 30% lower than their eGFRcr had an increased 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.26-3.11; P = .003). Conclusions and relevance: Results of this study suggest that among patients with cancer with simultaneous assessment of eGFRcys and eGFRcr, supratherapeutic drug levels and medication-related AEs occurred more commonly in those with an eGFRcys more than 30% lower than their eGFRcr. Future prospective studies are needed to improve and personalize GFR estimation and medication dosing in patients with cancer.

The effect of induced fetal demise on induction to expulsion interval during later medication abortion: A retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of induced fetal demise on the induction to expulsion interval during later trimester medication abortion. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort was conducted at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Ethiopia. Later medication abortion cases that had induced fetal demise were compared to matching cases with no induced fetal demise. Data were collected by reviewing maternal charts and analyzed using SPSS version 23. Simple descriptive analysis, χ2 test, and multiple logistic regression analysis were used as appropriate. Odds ratio, 95% CI, and p-value<0.05 were used to present the significance of the findings. RESULTS: A total of 208 patient charts were analyzed. Seventy-nine patients were provided with intra-amniotic digoxin, 37 patients were provided with intracardiac lidocaine, and 92 had no induced demise. The mean induction to expulsion interval was 17.8 hours in the intra-amniotic digoxin group, which is not statistically different than 19.3 hours in the intracardiac lidocaine and 18.5 hours in the group without induced fetal demise (p-value = 0.61). Expulsion rate after 24 hours was not statistically different among the three groups (5.1% in the digoxin group vs 10.6% intracardiac lidocaine group vs 7.8% in the no induced fetal demise group, p-value = 0.82). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that inducing fetal demise was not associated with successful expulsion at<24 hours (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.19, 95% CI, 0.03-1.29 and AOR = 0.62, 95% CI, 0.11-3.48, for digoxin and lidocaine, respectively) from induction. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, inducing fetal demise using digoxin or lidocaine prior to later medication abortion was not associated with a reduction in the induction to expulsion interval. IMPLICATIONS: During later medication abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol, inducing fetal demise may not be associated with a change in the length of the procedure. Induced fetal demise may be required for other reasons.

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Digoxin Toxicity in Heart Failure: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Digoxin toxicity (plasma digoxin concentration ≥0.9 ng/mL) is associated with worsening heart failure (HF). Decision tree (DT) analysis, a machine learning method, has a flowchart-like model where users can easily predict the risk of adverse drug reactions. The present study aimed to construct a flowchart using DT analysis that can be used by medical staff to predict digoxin toxicity. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study involving 333 adult patients with HF who received oral digoxin treatment. In this study, we employed a chi-squared automatic interaction detection algorithm to construct DT models. The dependent variable was set as the plasma digoxin concentration (≥ 0.9 ng/mL) in the trough during the steady state, and factors with p < 0.2 in the univariate analysis were set as the explanatory variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to validate the DT model. The accuracy and misclassification rates of the model were evaluated. In the DT analysis, patients with creatinine clearance <32 mL/min, daily digoxin dose ≥1.6 µg/kg, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% showed a high incidence of digoxin toxicity (91.8%; 45/49). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that creatinine clearance <32 mL/min and daily digoxin dose ≥1.6 µg/kg were independent risk factors. The accuracy and misclassification rates of the DT model were 88.2 and 46.2 ± 2.7%, respectively. Although the flowchart created in this study needs further validation, it is straightforward and potentially useful for medical staff in determining the initial dose of digoxin in patients with HF.

Effect of digoxin on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation with and without heart failure: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and 12 meta-analyses.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic umbrella review with meta-analysis to evaluate the certainty of evidence on mortality risk associated with digoxin use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with or without heart failure (HF). METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to 19 October 2021. We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies investigating digoxin effects on mortality of adult patients with AF and/or HF. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. Certainty of evidence was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool and the quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses by the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) tool. RESULTS: Eleven studies accounting for 12 meta-analyses were included with a total of 4,586,515 patients. AMSTAR2 analysis showed a high quality in 1, moderate in 5, low in 2, and critically low in 3 studies. Digoxin was associated with an increased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.14-1.25) with moderate certainty of evidence and with an increased cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.19, 95%CI 1.06-1.33) with moderate certainty of evidence. Subgroup analysis showed that digoxin was associated with all-cause mortality both in patients with AF alone (HR 1.23, 95%CI 1.19-1.28) and in those with AF and HF (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.12-1.16). CONCLUSION: Data from this umbrella review suggests that digoxin use is associated with a moderate increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in AF patients regardless of the presence of HF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022325321).

Effect of Chronic Digoxin Use on Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Background Digoxin acutely increases cardiac output in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and right ventricular failure; however, the effects of chronic digoxin use in PAH are unclear. Methods and Results Data from the Minnesota Pulmonary Hypertension Repository were used. The primary analysis used likelihood of digoxin prescription. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Secondary end points included all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, and transplant-free survival. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses determined the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for the primary and secondary end points. Among 205 patients with PAH in the repository, 32.7% (n=67) were on digoxin. Digoxin was more often prescribed to patients with severe PAH and right ventricular failure. After propensity score-matching, 49 patients were digoxin users, and 70 patients were nonusers; of these 31 (63.3%) in the digoxin group and 41 (58.6%) in nondigoxin group met the primary end point during a median follow-up time of 2.1 (0.6-5.0) years. Digoxin users had a higher combined all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.11-2.99]), all-cause mortality (HR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.06-3.49]), HF hospitalization (HR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.07-3.35]), and worse transplant-free survival (HR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.12-3.58]) even after adjusting for patient characteristics and severity of PAH and right ventricular failure. Conclusions In this retrospective, nonrandomized cohort, digoxin treatment was associated with greater all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, even after multivariate correction. Future randomized controlled trials should assess the safety and efficacy of chronic digoxin use in PAH.

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Digoxin Loading Doses Based on Ideal Body Weight.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous digoxin loading dose recommendations differ between clinical guidelines and Food and Drug Administration packaging for acute rate control. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous digoxin loading in patients who received ≤12 µg/kg and >12 µg/kg of digoxin using ideal body weight (IBW). METHODS: This single center retrospective cohort study with exempt status from the local Institutional Review Board included patients who received intravenous digoxin and had a serum digoxin concentration (SDC) drawn. Digoxin doses >36 hours after the first dose were excluded. Patients who received a total of >12 µg/kg and ≤12 µg/kg IBW were compared. The primary endpoint was frequency of SDCs ≥1.2 ng/mL, which have been shown to be associated with increased mortality. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were included (144 receiving >12 µg/kg and 100 receiving ≤12 µg/kg). There were significantly more SDC ≥1.2 ng/mL in the >12 µg/kg group than the ≤12 µg/kg group (50.6% vs. 30.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79-5.84), with no difference in rate control failure. Major limitations of the study include retrospective nature and possible selection bias. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Compared to patients who received digoxin doses ≤12 µg/kg IBW, patients who received >12 µg/kg IBW had higher rates of SDC ≥1.2 ng/mL. This suggests that appropriate weight-based dosing with 8 to 12 µg/kg IBW has the potential to be a safer approach to digoxin loading, rather than frequently used dosing strategies that result in doses >12 µg/kg.

Servicio de indicación farmacéutica a pacientes tratados con medicamentos de estrecho margen terapéutico / Minor ailment service for patients treated with narrow therapeutic index drug

Se estudian los casos de dos pacientes que demandan nuestro servicio de indicación farmacéutica porque presentan sintomatología digestiva inespecífica. Ambos están siendo tratados con fármacos de estrecho margen terapéutico (carbonato de litio y digoxina, respectivamente). Durante la indicación, el análisis de la medicación revela la posibilidad de que la clínica que ambos manifiestan guarde relación con estos tratamientos en distinta medida: en el caso del carbonato de litio, por tratarse de una reacción adversa frecuente en tratamientos prolongados, y en el de la digoxina, porque la sintomatología va acompañada de bradicardia. En consecuencia, se proponen dos intervenciones, siendo una de ellas la derivación urgente al médico de atención primaria. El análisis de los tratamientos farmacológicos crónicos prescritos a los pacientes, especialmente aquellos de estrecho margen terapéutico, durante el proceso de indicación, es un punto clave para discriminar entre clínica debida exclusivamente a síntomas menores y otras situaciones que pueden incluso comprometer la vida. (AU)

Closing the Digitalis Divide: Back to the Basics of Randomized Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: Publishe d decades after several randomized controlled trials (RCT) demonstrating decreased hospitalizations and no effect on all-cause mortality with digoxin use, a series of meta-analyses linking digoxin treatment and mortality have contributed to a narrower application of this medication for the management of heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Given the conflicting data from the earlier RCTs and more recent meta-analyses, there is a growing polarization among providers for and against the use of digoxin in managing these conditions. METHODS: To help close this divide, we provide a perspective on the literature with special attention to the quality of both older and more recent studies on this subject. RESULTS: The data from the highest quality studies we have, RCTs, suggest that digoxin use in patients with HF and/or AF is associated with improvement in several areas of outcomes including functional capacity, symptom management, reduced hospitalizations, fewer deaths due to HF, and treatment of refractory chronic heart failure with rEF, and may even have overall mortality benefit when serum digoxin concentrations are within therapeutic range. These effects are more pronounced in patients with EF < 25% and NYHA Class II-IV and at highest risk for hospitalization. CONCLUSION: As the risk of confounding factors was minimized by the study design, the likelihood that positive outcomes were identified with digoxin use increased. Clinicians and researchers need further adequately designed and powered RCTs exploring the connection between digoxin therapy and mortality, hospitalizations, and symptom management.

Analysis of Intoxication, Rehospitalization, and One-year Survival of Heart Failure Patients Receiving Digoxin at Harapan Kita National Cardiovascular Center, Jakarta, Indonesia: A Cross Section-observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite being the oldest therapy for heart failure, the use of digoxin is still controversial due to the narrow margin of safety. In Indonesia, digoxin is still considered one of the treatments for heart failure. However, analysis of intoxication has never been reported. This study aims to analyze the occurrence of digoxin intoxication, rate of rehospitalization and one-year survival in heart failure patients under digoxin treatment. METHODS: A cross section-observational study was conducted at Harapan Kita National Cardiovascular Centre from January 2017 to December 2018 on heart failure patients who received digoxin therapy and had data on serum digoxin level. Intoxication was defined as the presence of specific ECG alteration(s), at least one extra-cardiac symptom(s) and further classified as definite (serum digoxin >2 ng/mL), probable (serum digoxin 0.91-1.99 ng/mL), or possible (serum digoxin 0.5-0.9 ng/mL). Risk factors of intoxication were analyzed by Chi-square test, and one-year survival was analyzed with Kaplan Meyer method. RESULTS: 54 of 195 patients (27.69%) were classified as having intoxication, consisting of 32 (16.41%) definite, 19 (9.74%) probable, and 3 (1.54%) possible. Renal insufficiency was revealed as a significant influencing factor of digoxin intoxication with RR 2.48 (CI 1.13-5.464, p=0.016). Overall one-year survival of patients receiving digoxin was 259 days in the intoxication group and 307 days in the non-intoxication group. One-year rehospitalization was 11.8% in patients who received digoxin and 29.2% in those without digoxin (p=0.085). CONCLUSION: The proportion of digoxin intoxication in heart failure patients was 27.69%. Renal insufficiency was revealed as a significant influencing factor of intoxication. There was a tendency of reduced hospitalization in those who received digoxin.